A Turn Too Tight: Tragic A36 Beechcraft Crash

October 20, 2023
Final Report
Wreckage of an aircraft crash site in a forested area, showing charred debris including the right wing, left wing, engine, and propeller. The image is annotated with labels pointing to each major component. A dashed line indicates a 20-degree flight path angle leading to the "First point of impact," which is marked on two trees in the background. The surrounding trees show signs of damage and burn marks.
Incident Details
Highest Injury: Fatal
Number of Injuries: 2
City: Covelo
State: California
Aircraft Details
Aircraft Make: Beech
Aircraft Model: A36
Pilot Name/Operator: N/A
Registration #: N8248K
Departure Airport: O09
Additional Resources
Incident Briefing

On a clear autumn evening in October 2023, a highly experienced pilot lifted off from a small California airstrip with a single passenger onboard. What should have been a routine leg of a cross-country journey ended tragically just moments after takeoff. Today, we unpack the chain of decisions, environmental factors, and split-second dynamics that led to the fatal crash of a Beechcraft A36 Bonanza in Covelo—and the critical safety takeaways every pilot should carry forward.


A Veteran Pilot in Command

The man at the controls that day wasn’t a novice. At 54 years old, he held an airline transport pilot certificate and a first-class medical with no limitations. With over 20,000 total flight hours, his résumé reflected the experience of a seasoned professional. He was rated for both single-engine and multi-engine aircraft and was employed as a professional pilot. Yet even with those credentials, the accident underscores a sobering truth: aviation doesn’t discriminate when it comes to risk.


Aerial view of Round Valley Airport with labels indicating key locations and features. The single runway is marked with "16" on one end and "34" on the other. A white arrow labeled "Direction of flight" points northwest along the runway. Distances along the runway are marked: 0 ft at the southeast end, 2,400 ft, and 3,300 ft toward the northwest. A red arrow points to an "Intersection" near the middle of the runway, and a green arrow indicates the location of a "Fuel island" southeast of the runway. Surrounding terrain and airport facilities are also visible.

The Flight Plan: From Utah to the Coast

Departing from Heber City, Utah, the pilot and passenger set out on a personal flight under Part 91 regulations, destined for Shelter Cove on California’s rugged northern coast. After a 4-hour, 11-minute flight, the aircraft reached the vicinity of Shelter Cove—but instead of descending, it veered inland.

Why the detour? Satellite imagery later confirmed coastal cloud cover at the destination, likely prompting the pilot to divert. He touched down instead at Round Valley Airport (O09) in Covelo, topping off with about 90 gallons of fuel before preparing for another departure.


The Airport and the Environment

Round Valley is a small airport tucked amid steep hills and mountains. At 1,434 feet elevation, it offers two runways—10 and 28—each 3,670 feet long. The surrounding terrain, however, tells a different story. Off the end of runway 28, the direction chosen for takeoff, the land rises sharply with peaks and valleys and a 4,000-foot mountain just a mile away.

To make matters worse, FAA chart supplements failed to adequately describe the dangerous terrain immediately west of the runway—information that could have played a crucial role in the pilot’s decision-making.


Takeoff and the Fatal Turn

At approximately 6:01 p.m., with no flight plan filed and skies reportedly clear, the Bonanza lifted off runway 28. According to one witness, it was already near the departure end of the runway before becoming airborne. He and his children waved at the pilot, who waved back—a hauntingly personal detail in the minutes before disaster.

A second witness described the aircraft clearing a group of trees by about 20 feet, then entering a steep left turn with a bank angle of 70–80 degrees at just 60 feet above ground level. The aircraft quickly lost altitude and slammed into a hillside, erupting into flames.

What prompted such an aggressive turn? The NTSB couldn’t determine the precise reason. It’s possible the pilot was trying to maneuver away from terrain or react to a perceived engine issue—one witness did hear a brief “popping” sound. Still, engine and airframe analysis showed no mechanical anomalies.


Aerial view showing the terrain and flight path leading to an aircraft accident. The departure end of Runway 28 (elevation 1,430 feet MSL) is marked, with a red dashed line illustrating the flight path toward the "Accident Site." Two labeled witness locations (Witness 1 and Witness 2) are along the route. Elevation markers for surrounding terrain include 1,600 to 4,000 feet MSL, with a 4,000-foot ridge located 1 nautical mile west of the site. Distances from the runway are marked in nautical miles.

Performance Pressures

Performance data paints a telling picture. The aircraft, equipped with wingtip fuel tanks and heavily loaded, was close to its maximum takeoff weight of 3,833 lbs. Given the density altitude of over 3,200 feet and a tailwind component of 1 knot, the plane needed at least 2,625 feet of ground roll to take off safely. That left little room for error if the pilot started the takeoff from the fuel-pump-adjacent taxiway, which offered only 2,400 feet of available runway.

What’s more, the climb rate was reduced due to the aircraft’s weight. The STC (supplemental type certificate) called for a 100 fpm reduction in climb performance above 3,650 lbs, making terrain avoidance even more difficult after takeoff from runway 28.


Stall Speeds and Turning Limits

The aircraft’s stall speed under its configuration at the time—flaps up and heavily loaded—was about 64.5 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS). With an 80° bank angle, the stall speed would have climbed significantly. In fact, witnesses said the airplane appeared to be flying near stall speed (around 84 KIAS) while banked at a steep angle, potentially flirting with aerodynamic stall margins.

However, based on the angle of descent and the impact pattern, the NTSB concluded the crash was more consistent with controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) than a stall/spin. The pilot appeared to still be in control—but simply couldn’t outclimb or out-turn the rising terrain.


Decisions, Not Distractions

One decision stands out more than any other: the choice to depart on runway 28 rather than 10. Local pilots and residents noted that most aircraft typically take off to the east (runway 10), where flat farmland stretches for miles, offering ample escape routes in case of engine trouble. In contrast, runway 28 points almost immediately toward rising hills and that infamous 4,000-foot peak.

It’s worth noting that the FAA’s chart supplement lacked any detailed warning about this treacherous terrain—an omission cited as a contributing factor in the accident.


Zoomed-in satellite view highlighting the area between the departure end of Runway 28 and the accident site. The red dashed line labeled "Flight Path from Witness 2 Statement" curves toward the "Accident Site." Witness 2’s location is marked near a residential structure, approximately 600 feet from a key point on the path. Nearby structures, roads, and terrain features are visible for context.

Final Thoughts: Lessons from Covelo

This accident is not the result of one glaring mistake but a confluence of subtle risks: challenging terrain, a possibly short-field takeoff, heavy weight, modest tailwind, and an unexplained steep turn just after liftoff. Any one of these could be manageable in isolation—but together, they proved fatal.

For pilots, the lessons are sobering yet clear:

  • Respect the terrain. Even familiar airports can conceal deadly surprises, especially when chart supplements fall short.
  • Weight and performance margins matter. Being “within limits” doesn’t guarantee ample safety cushion.
  • Consider takeoff direction carefully. Especially at mountain-surrounded airports, the direction you choose can be the most critical decision of the flight.
  • Beware steep low-altitude turns. Especially when close to stall speed and with terrain looming ahead.

With over 20,000 hours in his logbook, the pilot was undoubtedly a competent aviator. But aviation is an unforgiving profession, and as this tragedy in Covelo reminds us, even the most experienced among us are only as safe as our last decision.

Additional Resources
Recent Mishaps

2 Comments

  1. Warren Walters

    Love these debriefs.

    1. Moira

      So do I.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Mishaps

Don’t Miss Out! Get Your FREE Weekly Aviaton Mishap Newsletter!

I promise I will never share your information